At least this kind of online nudity is safer than old-fashioned physical pedophilia. The article asked if a company with that unusual pedigree could keep a live-video site free from smut and keep its large community of teenage users safe from all the potential abuses. The network is designed primarily around the concept of voyeurism, not security.
The only thing that keeps children safe is good parenting and good schools — not trying to turn back the clock on progress.
You've been cooking pasta all wrong!
As my children grow older, I will carefully monitor their on-line activity.
For example, the avatar of a friend of yours in Second Life calls you on your cellphone from "in-world" because you're not in-world at the moment , and when you pick up, you see the picture of her avatar on your phone screen so you know where she's calling from.
That brings us to the second, more serious problem.
I have witnessed The Same Complaints and problems that stickam has had in the past year.
They would be upfront with their partners and businesses they sign deals with.
Users can 'kick off' offensive viewers - but only for an hour at a time.
The stickam service itself is amazing and in fact even the site navigation and utility is freaking ingeniously designed.
On the nine-hour drive home, I told Alice everything.
I was suddenly interrupted by the door to the utility hallway slamming open.
Care to guess what he looked like?
Thousands of eco-activists start to descend on London to 'shut down' the capital and cause misery for
And unlike video hosting sites, offending videos can only be removed after the fact — after an adult, for example, has exposed himself to underage kids.